profile

Welcome to our newsletter!

The Case Against Monitoring Employee Office Attendance

Published 7 months ago • 4 min read

In today's dynamic work environment, companies are constantly exploring ways to enhance employee productivity and engagement. One area that has garnered significant attention is the monitoring of employee office attendance. While some argue that tracking attendance can increase efficiency, it is essential to consider the adverse consequences it can have on employee morale, trust, and overall job satisfaction. A recent CBRE survey of employers found that 57% of companies are now tracking attendance, and almost half of them are doing so based on feedback from managers, while another 41% are tracking through badge swipes, sensors, or data indicating where an employee’s computer is being used. Of the companies that are tracking, 16% say they are enforcing attendance.

Companies are increasingly monitoring their employee office attendance for several reasons. First and foremost, attendance tracking provides a tangible way for employers to ensure that their workforce remains accountable and maintains a consistent presence in the workplace. This can be particularly crucial in industries that rely on teamwork or require employees to be physically present to fulfill their roles effectively. Attendance monitoring helps companies prevent excessive absenteeism and allows them to maintain a stable workflow.

Another key driver for the rise in attendance monitoring is the need to comply with labor laws and regulations. In some regions, labor laws stipulate specific working hours and require employers to track and manage attendance to ensure compliance. Companies face legal consequences if they do not adhere to these regulations, making attendance monitoring a necessary part of their compliance strategy. Additionally, monitoring attendance can help organizations calculate accurate payroll, manage overtime, and ensure that employees receive the appropriate compensation for their hours worked.

Lastly, attendance monitoring can serve as a tool for performance management and productivity improvement. By tracking attendance patterns, companies can identify trends and address issues related to punctuality and absenteeism. This data-driven approach allows organizations to make informed decisions about workforce management, such as adjusting staffing levels during peak hours or addressing recurring attendance issues through coaching and training.

While companies see a need for employee monitoring, it can decrease trust among employees and invade their privacy, leading to lower morale and higher turnover. A Pew survey found that 61% of workers oppose AI tracking their movements at work. When employees feel that their every move is being scrutinized, it erodes their sense of autonomy and respect, leading to a decrease in morale. This lack of trust can also lead to stress and anxiety, as employees may constantly worry about being judged based on their monitored activities. Additionally, the perception of being constantly monitored can foster a sense of resentment and reduce job satisfaction, ultimately driving talented employees to seek employment elsewhere, resulting in higher turnover rates as they search for workplaces that respect their privacy and offer a more supportive work environment.

In this newsletter, we will delve into why companies should reconsider monitoring their employees' office attendance, focusing on issues related to trust, autonomy, and the evolving nature of work.

Trust and Autonomy

One of the fundamental aspects of a healthy employer-employee relationship is trust. Employees who feel trusted by their employers are more likely to be motivated and committed to their work. Monitoring office attendance sends a message of mistrust to employees, implying that they are not responsible enough to manage their own time and work. This lack of trust can have a detrimental impact on employee morale and motivation.

When employees are constantly aware of being monitored, it can lead to a "Big Brother" atmosphere, where they feel like they are under constant surveillance. This can erode their sense of autonomy and freedom in the workplace, leading to decreased job satisfaction and potentially higher turnover rates. Companies should instead focus on fostering a culture of trust and empowerment, allowing employees to manage their time and work in a way that best suits their productivity.

Remote and Flexible Work

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of remote and flexible work arrangements. Many companies have embraced these changes and found that employees can be just as productive, if not more so when working remotely. Monitoring office attendance becomes increasingly irrelevant in a world where employees can effectively perform their tasks from various locations.

Imposing strict attendance monitoring policies in a remote or hybrid work environment not only feels archaic but also ignores the benefits of flexibility. Employees may have personal or family obligations that require them to work at different hours or locations. By allowing flexibility, companies can attract a diverse workforce and accommodate the needs of employees, resulting in a more engaged and satisfied workforce.

Focus on Output, not Hours

The traditional model of work is built on the assumption that the number of hours spent in the office correlates directly with productivity. However, this assumption has been challenged by numerous studies and the experiences of companies that prioritize results over time spent at the desk. Measuring output and results, rather than attendance, can be a more accurate gauge of employee performance.

Employees should be evaluated based on the quality and quantity of their work, not on how many hours they spend in the office. In fact, monitoring attendance may inadvertently encourage "presenteeism" where employees are physically present but not necessarily productive. Focusing on output allows employees to find their most efficient and effective ways of working, ultimately benefiting both the employee and the company.

Employee Well-being

The relentless monitoring of office attendance can lead to burnout and increased stress among employees. The pressure to always be present in the office can result in longer working hours and less time for relaxation and personal life. This, in turn, can negatively impact mental and physical health, ultimately affecting job performance.

Companies that prioritize employee well-being are more likely to have a motivated and healthy workforce. Monitoring attendance can have the opposite effect, pushing employees to prioritize the appearance of work over their own health and well-being. By not obsessively tracking attendance, companies can encourage employees to maintain a healthier work-life balance, leading to improved productivity and job satisfaction.

Cost and Resources

Implementing and maintaining attendance monitoring systems can be costly and resource-intensive for companies. From investing in hardware and software to hiring personnel to oversee these systems, the financial burden can be substantial. Moreover, the time and effort spent on monitoring attendance could be better directed toward more meaningful HR initiatives, such as employee development and engagement programs.

It's important for companies to weigh the costs and benefits of attendance monitoring against the potential gains in productivity. In many cases, the return on investment may not justify the expense, especially when considering the negative impact on employee morale and well-being.

In conclusion, the monitoring of employee office attendance can have detrimental effects on trust, autonomy, and overall job satisfaction. In today's evolving work landscape, where remote and flexible work arrangements are increasingly common, a focus on attendance becomes obsolete and counterproductive. Instead, companies should prioritize trust, autonomy, output-based evaluation, employee well-being, and the allocation of resources to more meaningful HR initiatives. By doing so, they can create a more motivated, engaged, and productive workforce that thrives in the modern workplace.

Thanks for reading — be sure to join the conversation on LinkedIn and let me know your thoughts on this topic!


Welcome to our newsletter!

Check out the previous issues of the Workplace Intelligence Insider newsletter below and subscribe now to get new articles every Monday.

Read more from Welcome to our newsletter!

News Spotlight Big tech's commitment to reskill the workforce. Google, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, and others have formed the AI-Enabled Information and Communication Technology Workforce Consortium to help those who have lost or will lose their jobs to AI to either upskill or reskill them so they can reenter the workforce (ZDNET). Remote work is the secret to closing the gender gap. When women were able to work remotely during the pandemic, they were able to better balance their work and family...

7 days ago • 5 min read

News Spotlight Workers plan to look for a new job this year. Most Americans are planning to look for a new job in 2024 because they desire a higher income (CNBC). Quiet cutting is the new workforce trend. Employees report seeing their company reduce someone’s job role, so they’ll quit on their own (Fortune). Young workers skip corporate to enter the trades. Gen Z’s are going into the trades because of rising pay, job security, and new technologies (Wall Street Journal). Stat of the Week Most...

14 days ago • 4 min read

News Spotlight White House admits jobs will be automated by AI. The White House now says that 10% of U.S. workers are in jobs that are most at risk due to the disruption caused by AI (CNN). Employers are hiring etiquette coaches. 60% of bosses are hiring etiquette coaches to help remote workers better transition to office environments (Business Insider). Childcare benefits take center stage. Over half of companies say that child-care benefits are the most pressing issue this year, which is...

21 days ago • 6 min read
Share this post